Data-security regulation for financial data protects customer information held by financial institutions. Whether your fintech is one depends on your activities. Lending, payments and money transmission, financial-data aggregation, wealth and investing, and deposit-adjacent products generally fall inside that definition, which is why we assess coverage before building anything.
FinTech companies hold high-value financial data.
Your systems hold customer personal identifiers, account and transaction data, and, for aggregation and open-banking products, the bank credentials that reach a customer's deposit accounts. That is precisely the customer financial data these rules are written to protect.
Account takeover, credential theft, and business email compromise target this data directly. The controls the rules require, including MFA, encryption, and access controls, are the same controls that defend against the most common attacks on financial applications and their APIs.
Coverage and the exact regulator are activity-dependent.
A fintech engaged in a financial activity and under FTC jurisdiction, meaning non-bank and not SEC-regulated, is generally subject to the FTC Safeguards Rule. A fintech regulated by the SEC or operating as a bank follows a different regulator. We do not assume the rule applies. We assess your specific activities and structure and document why and how each obligation reaches you.
Because the answer turns on facts, the program we build is scoped to the obligations you actually carry rather than to a generic checklist. That keeps the work honest and defensible if a regulator or partner asks how you determined scope.
Bank partners and processors flow obligations down to you.
Fintechs that partner with a chartered bank, or that act as a service provider to one, frequently inherit security obligations through the bank's vendor-oversight program and through GLBA as a service provider. Your bank and processor contracts often specify controls, evidence, and notification timelines you must meet.
We inventory those relationships, map the flowed-down requirements, and fold them into your written program so a bank-partner security review or annual attestation is answered from a program that is already running rather than assembled under deadline.
SOC 2 is the report partners ask for, and it is built on the same controls.
Many fintechs pursue SOC 2 because it is the report investors, enterprise customers, and bank partners request. A SOC 2 report is issued by an independent CPA firm, not by Cyber One Solutions. What we do is build and operate the readiness: the access controls, encryption, logging, change management, vendor oversight, and secure development the auditor evaluates.
Because the Safeguards Rule, bank-partner requirements, and SOC 2 draw on a common control set, one coherent program can support all three. The same evidence answers the federal rule, the partner questionnaire, and the auditor rather than duplicating effort for each.