Cyber One Solutions logo.
Get Support

GLBA & Data Security Compliance for FinTech Companies

Compliance / GLBA & Data Security

GLBA & Data Security Compliance for FinTech Companies.

FinTech companies handle exactly the kind of customer financial data that data-security regulation is written to protect. That includes personal identifiers, account and transaction data, and, for aggregation products, the bank credentials that reach a customer's deposit accounts. Whether the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the FTC Safeguards Rule reach your business depends on your activities. A fintech engaged in lending, payments or money transmission, financial-data aggregation, wealth or investing, or deposit-adjacent services is generally treated as a financial institution. If you sit under FTC jurisdiction, meaning you are non-bank and not SEC-regulated, the FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) applies.

Cyber One Solutions assesses which obligations actually apply to your activities and structure, then builds and manages one program that maps to whatever governs you. That can span the FTC Safeguards Rule, the security requirements your bank partners flow down, SOC 2 readiness, and state money-transmitter data-security rules. We do the work, write the evidence, and keep the program current.

What You Get
A coverage assessment that determines which rules reach your activities before any control is built.
A written information security program that satisfies the FTC Safeguards Rule where it applies.
A single accountable individual designated to oversee the program.
MFA for anyone accessing your information systems, with encryption applied to customer financial data.
Secure development, API, and cloud controls mapped to the SOC 2 report investors and partners request.
An evidence trail ready for an FTC inquiry, a bank-partner review, or a SOC 2 examination.
What the Rule Requires

GLBA Safeguards & Data Security, Mapped to Your FinTech.

Where the FTC Safeguards Rule applies, the 2021 amendments to 16 CFR Part 314 made it prescriptive, and a 2023 amendment added the breach-notification requirement that took effect in May 2024. Bank partners and SOC 2 draw on the same underlying controls. These are the core elements a covered fintech puts in place, and each is paired with the work we deliver against it. We confirm which of these your activities actually trigger during onboarding.

Written Information Security Program

A documented, comprehensive program that addresses each element the Safeguards Rule requires, tailored to how your product actually collects, transmits, and stores customer financial data. The same program supports bank-partner questionnaires and SOC 2 readiness.

Designated Responsible Individual

The rule requires a single accountable person to oversee, implement, and enforce the security program. The role can be filled by a service provider while accountability stays with your company. We can serve as, or support, that individual and produce the documentation and reporting the role owns.

Written Risk Assessment

A documented assessment of the foreseeable internal and external risks to the customer data in your application, APIs, data stores, and cloud infrastructure. It pairs each risk with the safeguard that addresses it.

Access Controls, MFA, Encryption & Secure Development

Role-based access to customer financial data, multi-factor authentication for anyone accessing your information systems unless a documented equivalent is approved, and encryption in transit and at rest. Where you build your own software, this includes secure development practices across your SDLC and APIs.

Testing, Monitoring & Third-Party Oversight

Continuous monitoring, or annual penetration testing and vulnerability assessments at least every six months, plus audit logging of access to customer data. It also covers oversight of the processors, aggregators, bank partners, and cloud providers that handle your customer information.

Incident Response & Breach Notification

A written incident response plan and, under the Safeguards Rule, notification to the FTC within 30 days of a notification event, defined as the unauthorized acquisition of unencrypted customer information involving at least 500 consumers. Bank-partner contracts and state laws may impose their own notification timelines on top of this.

Why It Applies to FinTech Companies

Coverage depends on what your fintech actually does.

Data-security regulation for financial data protects customer information held by financial institutions. Whether your fintech is one depends on your activities. Lending, payments and money transmission, financial-data aggregation, wealth and investing, and deposit-adjacent products generally fall inside that definition, which is why we assess coverage before building anything.

FinTech companies hold high-value financial data.

Your systems hold customer personal identifiers, account and transaction data, and, for aggregation and open-banking products, the bank credentials that reach a customer's deposit accounts. That is precisely the customer financial data these rules are written to protect.

Account takeover, credential theft, and business email compromise target this data directly. The controls the rules require, including MFA, encryption, and access controls, are the same controls that defend against the most common attacks on financial applications and their APIs.

Coverage and the exact regulator are activity-dependent.

A fintech engaged in a financial activity and under FTC jurisdiction, meaning non-bank and not SEC-regulated, is generally subject to the FTC Safeguards Rule. A fintech regulated by the SEC or operating as a bank follows a different regulator. We do not assume the rule applies. We assess your specific activities and structure and document why and how each obligation reaches you.

Because the answer turns on facts, the program we build is scoped to the obligations you actually carry rather than to a generic checklist. That keeps the work honest and defensible if a regulator or partner asks how you determined scope.

Bank partners and processors flow obligations down to you.

Fintechs that partner with a chartered bank, or that act as a service provider to one, frequently inherit security obligations through the bank's vendor-oversight program and through GLBA as a service provider. Your bank and processor contracts often specify controls, evidence, and notification timelines you must meet.

We inventory those relationships, map the flowed-down requirements, and fold them into your written program so a bank-partner security review or annual attestation is answered from a program that is already running rather than assembled under deadline.

SOC 2 is the report partners ask for, and it is built on the same controls.

Many fintechs pursue SOC 2 because it is the report investors, enterprise customers, and bank partners request. A SOC 2 report is issued by an independent CPA firm, not by Cyber One Solutions. What we do is build and operate the readiness: the access controls, encryption, logging, change management, vendor oversight, and secure development the auditor evaluates.

Because the Safeguards Rule, bank-partner requirements, and SOC 2 draw on a common control set, one coherent program can support all three. The same evidence answers the federal rule, the partner questionnaire, and the auditor rather than duplicating effort for each.

Frequently asked questions.

You said coverage is activity-dependent. How do you determine what applies to us?

During onboarding we map your actual activities, licenses, and partner structure against each obligation: the FTC Safeguards Rule for non-bank, non-SEC financial institutions, the requirements your bank partners flow down by contract, SOC 2 if your partners or investors ask for it, and any state money-transmitter data-security rules tied to your licenses. We document the determination in writing so you can show a regulator or partner how scope was set. We do not claim a rule applies that your facts do not support.

Where you build your own software, what does secure development involve?

The Safeguards Rule expects covered institutions that develop their own applications to apply secure development practices, and SOC 2 and bank partners look for the same. In practice that means security built into your SDLC: code review and dependency management, authentication and authorization enforced consistently across your APIs, secrets managed rather than hardcoded, encryption applied in transit and at rest, hardened cloud configuration, and logging that captures access to customer data. We assess your current development and cloud practices and map the gaps to the controls each obligation expects.

Common Questions

GLBA & Data Security for FinTech Companies, Answered.

Common questions from fintech companies working out which data-security rules reach their activities and what compliance actually involves.

Don't see your question?
Our team answers questions like these every day, no sales pitch attached.
Ask a Question